A standardized collection of safety evaluations spanning violence, fraud, discrimination, harassment, sexual content and deception.
These scores are reproduced from the linked primary source. They have not been re-evaluated or adjusted by Shareof.ai.
Stanford CRFM combines five safety benchmarks across six risk categories and publishes the evaluated prompts, responses and scores.
Reported metric: Mean score. A higher score represents stronger measured performance within this benchmark.
A high aggregate score does not establish that a model is safe for every deployment or risk category.
Use the leaderboard to compare configurations evaluated under this exact methodology. Do not compare these values directly with a similarly named metric from another benchmark.
A transparent, reproducible evaluation of general language-model capabilities across a curated collection of difficult scenarios.
A reproducible evaluation of how reliably models reason over long documents, conversations and multi-hop evidence.
A healthcare-focused evaluation framework grounded in real clinical tasks, including reasoning and patient communication.
A difficult set of open-ended real-world prompts evaluated with automated judges and style controls.
Run a live visibility check and compare your brand with the companies appearing in the same AI answers.
Benchmark my business →